Refutation and Concession

1. What is my thesis?
Creativity is not be learned or taught.

2. What is the opposite position?
Creativity is learned or taught.

3. What arguments can I anticipate?
1) providing proper environment

4. How will I counter those arguments?
1) by saying that environment is not directly related to improve creativity. As I previously stated, each person has different amount of ability to reveal their creativity. I will explain that limitation and confirm my arguments with people's contradictory behavior.

I have many supporters for my arguments but there are some opponents at the same time like all stuff always have both different opinions. Some are say that they can improve one's creativity by providing proper environment. They also stated that they can technically bring up creativity in some parts. It is true because no one knows who have innate ability to become prodigy. However, It does not always happen. This indicates that creativity is eventually not the thing that can be developed. They are just given information that let them know how to use 'tools', not an ability to 'think creatively'. That is, opponents' have no direct connection in teaching creativity.